![\"Civilization](\"images\/civIV.jpg\")
Civilization’da hedeflerden birine ula\u015f\u0131l\u0131p da, akabinde oyun bittikten sonra acaba ka\u00e7\u0131m\u0131z gelen teklifi de\u011ferlendirip, oynamaya devam eder? Ya da, daha do\u011frusu neden devam edilmez<\/b>? Bug\u00fcn, Banks’in 1994’te Culture<\/i> \u00fczerine yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir makaleyi<\/a> okurken kendimi bunu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcrken buldum — daha do\u011frusu, sava\u015f\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, her medeniyetin di\u011fer medeniyetlerin sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131na \/ toprak \u00e7almas\u0131na \/ casus g\u00f6ndermesine kar\u015f\u0131 \u00f6nlem alma gere\u011fi duymad\u0131\u011f\u0131, tamam\u0131yla \u00fctopik bir mod<\/i>‘u tasarlamaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131m.<\/p>\nUzunca bir s\u00fcredir mevcut olan lakin pek kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131m bir blog kategorim var “\u00dctopya\/distopya” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131. Hatta, \u00fc\u015fenmedim, gittim bakt\u0131m, hepi topu 3 adet giri\u015fi bu kategoriye dahil etmi\u015fim ve bunlar\u0131n da ikisini hikayeler olu\u015fturmakta. Culture serisinden \u015fimdilik 3 kitap okumu\u015f durumday\u0131m (Consider Phlebas \/ Player of Games \/ Use of Weapons<\/i>) fakat arzu etti\u011fim \u00fctopyan\u0131n ta kendisi oluverdi. Benim hayalimdeki cennet, yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f b\u00fct\u00fcn kitaplar\u0131 bar\u0131nd\u0131ran (yan\u0131nda filmler de olsa iyi olurdu) devasa bir k\u00fct\u00fcphane olagelmi\u015ftir (ve l\u00fctfen nargile ve puro ba\u015fta olmak \u00fczere envai \u00e7e\u015fit t\u00fct\u00fcn \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc – ah tabii ki \u00f6l\u00fcms\u00fczl\u00fck de cabas\u0131, zaten cennet<\/u> dedim dikkat ederseniz!). B\u00f6yle bir hayat\u0131 s\u00fcrmek i\u00e7in Culture evreni de hi\u00e7 fena de\u011fil. Ka\u00e7 haftad\u0131r \u015f\u00f6yle bir \u00f6zet ge\u00e7eyim istiyordum ama zaten sa\u011folsun Banks yukar\u0131da an\u0131lan makalede g\u00fczel g\u00fczel \u00f6zetlemi\u015f:<\/p>\n
| <\/p>\n […]As mentioned above, there is another force at work in the Culture aside from the nature of its human inhabitants and the limitations and opportunities presented by life in space, and that is Artificial Intelligence. This is taken for granted in the Culture stories, and – unlike FTL travel – is not only likely in the future of our own species, but probably inevitable (always assuming homo sapiens avoids destruction). <\/p>\n Certainly there are arguments against the possibility of Artificial Intelligence, but they tend to boil down to one of three assertions: one, that there is some vital field or other presently intangible influence exclusive to biological life – perhaps even carbon-based biological life – which may eventually fall within the remit of scientific understanding but which cannot be emulated in any other form (all of which is neither impossible nor likely); two, that self-awareness resides in a supernatural soul – presumably linked to a broad-based occult system involving gods or a god, reincarnation or whatever – and which one assumes can never be understood scientifically (equally improbable, though I do write as an atheist); and, three, that matter cannot become self-aware (or more precisely that it cannot support any informational formulation which might be said to be self-aware or taken together with its material substrate exhibit the signs of self-awareness). …I leave all the more than nominally self-aware readers to spot the logical problem with that argument. <\/p>\n It is, of course, entirely possible that real AIs will refuse to have anything to do with their human creators (or rather, perhaps, the human creators of their non-human creators), but assuming that they do – and the design of their software may be amenable to optimization in this regard – I would argue that it is quite possible they would agree to help further the aims of their source civilisation (a contention we’ll return to shortly). At this point, regardless of whatever alterations humanity might impose on itself through genetic manipulation, humanity would no longer be a one-sentience-type species. The future of our species would affect, be affected by and coexist with the future of the AI life-forms we create. <\/p>\n The Culture reached this phase at around the same time as it began to inhabit space. Its AIs cooperate with the humans of the civilisation; at first the struggle is simply to survive and thrive in space; later – when the technology required to do so has become mundane – the task becomes less physical, more metaphysical, and the aims of civilisation moral rather than material. <\/p>\n Briefly, nothing and nobody in the Culture is exploited. It is essentially an automated civilisation in its manufacturing processes, with human labour restricted to something indistinguishable from play, or a hobby. <\/p>\n No machine is exploited, either; the idea here being that any job can be automated in such a way as to ensure that it can be done by a machine well below the level of potential consciousness; what to us would be a stunningly sophisticated computer running a factory (for example) would be looked on by the Culture’s AIs as a glorified calculator, and no more exploited than an insect is exploited when it pollinates a fruit tree a human later eats a fruit from. <\/p>\n Where intelligent supervision of a manufacturing or maintenance operation is required, the intellectual challenge involved (and the relative lightness of the effort required) would make such supervision rewarding and enjoyable, whether for human or machine. The precise degree of supervision required can be adjusted to a level which satisfies the demand for it arising from the nature of the civilisation’s members. People – and, I’d argue, the sort of conscious machines which would happily cooperate with them – hate to feel exploited, but they also hate to feel useless. One of the most important tasks in setting up and running a stable and internally content civilisation is finding an acceptable balance between the desire for freedom of choice in one’s actions (and the freedom from mortal fear in one’s life) and the need to feel that even in a society so self-correctingly Utopian one is still contributing something. Philosophy matters, here, and sound education. <\/p>\n Education in the Culture is something that never ends; it may be at its most intense in the first tenth or so of an individual’s life, but it goes on until death (another subject we’ll return to). To live in the Culture is to live in a fundamentally rational civilisation (this may preclude the human species from ever achieving something similar; our history is, arguably, not encouraging in this regard). The Culture is quite self-consciously rational, sceptical, and materialist. Everything matters, and nothing does. Vast though the Culture may be – thirty trillion people, scattered fairly evenly through the galaxy – it is thinly spread, exists for now solely in this one galaxy, and has only been around for an eyeblink, compared to the life of the universe. There is life, and enjoyment, but what of it? Most matter is not animate, most that is animate is not sentient, and the ferocity of evolution pre-sentience (and, too often, post-sentience) has filled uncountable lives with pain and suffering. And even universes die, eventually. (Though we’ll come back to that, too.) <\/p>\n In the midst of this, the average Culture person – human or machine – knows that they are lucky to be where they are when they are. Part of their education, both initially and continually, comprises the understanding that beings less fortunate – though no less intellectually or morally worthy – than themselves have suffered and, elsewhere, are still suffering. For the Culture to continue without terminal decadence, the point needs to be made, regularly, that its easy hedonism is not some ground-state of nature, but something desirable, assiduously worked for in the past, not necessarily easily attained, and requiring appreciation and maintenance both in the present and the future. <\/p>\n An understanding of the place the Culture occupies in the history and development of life in the galaxy is what helps drive the civilisation’s largely cooperative and – it would claim – fundamentally benign techno-cultural diplomatic policy, but the ideas behind it go deeper. Philosophically, the Culture accepts, generally, that questions such as ‘What is the meaning of life?’ are themselves meaningless. The question implies – indeed an answer to it would demand – a moral framework beyond the only moral framework we can comprehend without resorting to superstition (and thus abandoning the moral framework informing – and symbiotic with – language itself). <\/p>\n In summary, we make our own meanings, whether we like it or not. <\/p>\n The same self-generative belief-system applies to the Culture’s AIs. They are designed (by other AIs, for virtually all of the Culture’s history) within very broad parameters, but those parameters do exist; Culture AIs are designed to want to live, to want to experience, to desire to understand, and to find existence and their own thought-processes in some way rewarding, even enjoyable. <\/p>\n The humans of the Culture, having solved all the obvious problems of their shared pasts to be free from hunger, want, disease and the fear of natural disaster and attack, would find it a slightly empty existence only and merely enjoying themselves, and so need the good-works of the Contact section to let them feel vicariously useful. For the Culture’s AIs, that need to feel useful is largely replaced by the desire to experience, but as a drive it is no less strong. The universe – or at least in this era, the galaxy – is waiting there, largely unexplored (by the Culture, anyway), its physical principles and laws quite comprehensively understood but the results of fifteen billion years of the chaotically formative application and interaction of those laws still far from fully mapped and evaluated. <\/p>\n By Go\u00eedel out of Chaos, the galaxy is, in other words, an immensely, intrinsically, and inexhaustibly interesting place; an intellectual playground for machines that know everything except fear and what lies hidden within the next uncharted stellar system. <\/p>\n This is where I think one has to ask why any AI civilisation – and probably any sophisticated culture at all – would want to spread itself everywhere in the galaxy (or the universe, for that matter). It would be perfectly possible to build a Von Neumann machine that would build copies of itself and eventually, unless stopped, turn the universe into nothing but those self-copies, but the question does arise; why? What is the point? To put it in what we might still regard as frivolous terms but which the Culture would have the wisdom to take perfectly seriously, where is the fun in that? <\/p>\n Interest – the delight in experience, in understanding – comes from the unknown; understanding is a process as well as a state, denoting the shift from the unknown to the known, from the random to the ordered… a universe where everything is already understood perfectly and where uniformity has replaced diversity, would, I’d contend, be anathema to any self-respecting AI. <\/p>\n Probably only humans find the idea of Von Neumann machines frightening, because we half-understand – and even partially relate to – the obsessiveness of the ethos such constructs embody. An AI would think the idea mad, ludicrous and – perhaps most damning of all – boring. <\/p>\n This is not to say that the odd Von-Neumann-machine event doesn’t crop up in the galaxy every now and again (probably by accident rather than design), but something so rampantly monomaniac is unlikely to last long pitched against beings possessed of a more rounded wit, and which really only want to alter the Von Neumann machine’s software a bit and make friends… <\/p>\n One idea behind the Culture as it is depicted in the stories is that it has gone through cyclical stages during which there has been extensive human-machine interfacing, and other stages (sometimes coinciding with the human-machine eras) when extensive genetic alteration has been the norm. The era of the stories written so far – dating from about 1300 AD to 2100 AD – is one in which the people of the Culture have returned, probably temporarily, to something more ‘classical’ in terms of their relations with the machines and the potential of their own genes. <\/p>\n The Culture recognises, expects and incorporates fashions – albeit long-term fashions – in such matters. It can look back to times when people lived much of their lives in what we would now call cyberspace, and to eras when people chose to alter themselves or their children through genetic manipulation, producing a variety of morphological sub-species. Remnants of the various waves of such civilisational fashions can be found scattered throughout the Culture, and virtually everyone in the Culture carries the results of genetic manipulation in every cell of their body; it is arguably the most reliable signifier of Culture status. <\/p>\n Thanks to that genetic manipulation, the average Culture human will be born whole and healthy and of significantly (though not immensely) greater intelligence than their basic human genetic inheritance might imply. There are thousands of alterations to that human-basic inheritance – blister-free callusing and a clot-filter protecting the brain are two of the less important ones mentioned in the stories – but the major changes the standard Culture person would expect to be born with would include an optimized immune system and enhanced senses, freedom from inheritable diseases or defects, the ability to control their autonomic processes and nervous system (pain can, in effect, be switched off), and to survive and fully recover from wounds which would either kill or permanently mutilate without such genetic tinkering. <\/p>\n The vast majority of people are also born with greatly altered glands housed within their central nervous systems, usually referred to as ‘drug glands’. These secrete – on command – mood- and sensory-appreciation-altering compounds into the person’s bloodstream. A similar preponderance of Culture inhabitants have subtly altered reproductive organs – and control over the associated nerves – to enhance sexual pleasure. Ovulation is at will in the female, and a fetus up to a certain stage may be re-absorbed, aborted, or held at a static point in its development; again, as willed. An elaborate thought-code, self-administered in a trance-like state (or simply a consistent desire, even if not conscious) will lead, over the course of about a year, to what amounts to a viral change from one sex into the other. The convention – tradition, even – in the Culture during the time of the stories written so far is that each person should give birth to one child in their lives. In practice, the population grows slowly. (And sporadically, in addition, for other reasons, as we’ll come to later.) <\/p>\n To us, perhaps, the idea of being able to find out what sex is like for our complimentary gender, or being able to get drunk\/stoned\/tripped-out or whatever just by thinking about it (and of course the Culture’s drug-glands produce no unpleasant side-effects or physiological addiction) may seem like mere wish-fulfilment. And indeed it is partly wish-fulfilment, but then the fulfilment of wishes is both one of civilisation’s most powerful drives and arguably one of its highest functions; we wish to live longer, we wish to live more comfortably, we wish to live with less anxiety and more enjoyment, less ignorance and more knowledge than our ancestors did… but the abilities to change sex and to alter one’s brain-chemistry – without resort to external technology or any form of payment – both have more serious functions within the Culture. A society in which it is so easy to change sex will rapidly find out if it is treating one gender better than the other; within the population, over time, there will gradually be greater and greater numbers of the sex it is more rewarding to be, and so pressure for change – within society rather than the individuals – will presumably therefore build up until some form of sexual equality and hence numerical parity is established. In a similar fashion, a society in which everybody is free to, and does, choose to spend the majority of their time zonked out of their brains will know that there is something significantly wrong with reality, and (one would hope) do what it can to make that reality more appealing and less – in the pejorative sense – mundane. <\/p>\n Implicit in the stories so far is that through self-correcting mechanisms of this nature the Culture reached a rough steady-state in such matters thousands of years ago, and has settled into a kind of long-lived civilisational main sequence which should last for the forseeable future, and thousands of generations. <\/p>\n Which brings us to the length of those generations, and the fact that they can be said to exist at all. Humans in the Culture normally live about three-and-a-half to four centuries. The majority of their lives consists of a three-century plateau which they reach in what we would compare to our mid-twenties, after a relatively normal pace of maturation during childhood, adolescence and early adulthood. They age very slowly during those three hundred years, then begin to age more quickly, then they die. <\/p>\n Philosophy, again; death is regarded as part of life, and nothing, including the universe, lasts forever. It is seen as bad manners to try and pretend that death is somehow not natural; instead death is seen as giving shape to life. <\/p>\n While burial, cremation and other – to us – conventional forms of body disposal are not unknown in the Culture, the most common form of funeral involves the deceased – usually surrounded by friends – being visited by a Displacement Drone, which – using the technique of near-instantaneous transmission of a remotely induced singularity via hyperspace – removes the corpse from its last resting place and deposits it in the core of the relevant system’s sun, from where the component particles of the cadaver start a million-year migration to the star’s surface, to shine – possibly – long after the Culture itself is history. <\/p>\n None of this, of course, is compulsory (nothing in the Culture is compulsory). Some people choose biological immortality; others have their personality transcribed into AIs and die happy feeling they continue to exist elsewhere; others again go into Storage, to be woken in more (or less) interesting times, or only every decade, or century, or aeon, or over exponentially increasing intervals, or only when it looks like something really different is happening…[…]<\/p>\n Iain M. Banks, A Few Notes On Culture,<\/i> 1994 <\/b><\/div>\n <\/TD><\/TR><\/TABLE><\/p>\n Uzunca bir al\u0131nt\u0131 oldu, de\u011fil mi? Geldi\u011fi yerde daha da uzunu var ama, halimize \u015f\u00fckretmeliyiz… Hem okumak zorunda da de\u011filsiniz, ben bile sadece bug\u00fcn okudu\u011fumla yetindim, \u015fimdi al\u0131nt\u0131larken bir daha okumay\u0131p, kopya\/pasta karde\u015flerin h\u00fcnerli ellerine b\u0131rakt\u0131m kendimi. Ho\u015f olan, Banks’in yukar\u0131da bahsetti\u011fim makalesinde, Culture evreninin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tart\u0131\u015f\u0131rken, “insanlar\u0131n birbirlerini yok etmedi\u011fi varsay\u0131m\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu” \u015ferhini koymas\u0131. Bu konuyu a\u00e7acak olursak:<\/p>\n Daha evvelden de belirtmi\u015f idim, \u00f6ncelikli olarak \u00e7evirmek istedi\u011fim kitap (ki kitap \u00e7evirece\u011fimden de\u011fil, lakin bir g\u00fcn \u00e7evirecek olursam, zaten topu topu iki kitap var \u00e7evirmek istedi\u011fim) Robert Michels’in On Political Parties <\/i>‘idir (di\u011feri de Murakami’nin Wind-Up Bird Chronicles<\/i>‘\u0131 zaten). \u0130\u015fte o kitapta Robert Michels, sayg\u0131 duydu\u011fum bir saptamada bulunur: Oligar\u015finin Demir Yasas\u0131. Nedir bu yasa:<\/p>\n
|