Efsane dizilerden Murphy Brown’\u0131n bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde tak\u0131m olarak yar\u0131\u015fmaya gideceklerdir. Murphy Brown’\u0131n tak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 bar\u0131n barmeni bir cep gurusu olarak, bir ismi s\u00f6yler (\u015fimdi hat\u0131rlayamad\u0131m, nette de bulamad\u0131m), “Nobel’le ilgili bir soru sorarlarsa cevap budur.” der. Hakikaten de yar\u0131\u015fmada hi\u00e7bir soruyu bilemezler (rakipleri hep onlardan \u00f6nce cevap verir) ama sunucu “Nobel..” diye ba\u015flay\u0131nca hemen atlarlar ve hanelerine skoru eklerler.<\/p>\n
Bu nereden akl\u0131ma geldi? Ba\u015fl\u0131ktan. Ola ki bir yerde Eco ve Shakespeare adlar\u0131n\u0131 yan yana g\u00f6r\u00fcrseniz, bilin ki, o yaz\u0131 G\u00fcl\u00fcn Ad\u0131 <\/i>ve Romeo ile Juliet<\/i>‘i kesi\u015ftiren g\u00fcl mevzusu \u00fczerine olacakt\u0131r. Bildi\u011finiz \u00fczere Juliet (Capulet) ile Romeo (Montague) birbirlerine d\u00fc\u015fman ailelerin \u00e7ocuklar\u0131d\u0131r. Balkon sahnesinde Juliet, isimlerin de\u011fil, nesnelerin \u00f6nemli oldu\u011funu belirtir:<\/p>\n
| <\/p>\n ‘Tis but thy name that is my enemy;– \nThou art thyself, though not a Montague. \nWhat’s Montague? It is nor hand, nor foot, \nNor arm, nor face, nor any other part \nBelonging to a man. O, be some other name! \nWhat’s in a name? that which we call a rose \nBy any other name would smell as sweet; \nSo Romeo would, were he not Romeo call’d, \nRetain that dear perfection which he owes \nWithout that title:–Romeo, doff thy name; \nAnd for that name, which is no part of thee, \nTake all myself.<\/div>\n <\/TD><\/TR><\/TABLE><\/p>\n \u0130\u015fte bu mesele biraz daha geli\u015ftirilir, aksi y\u00f6nden yakla\u015f\u0131l\u0131r Eco’da, G\u00fcl\u00fcn Ad\u0131<\/p>\n
|